"Are stainless steel lunch boxes better?" is one of the most common questions we get, and the honest answer is: better at what, specifically. All three materials we use, silicone, plastic and stainless steel, are food safe. None of them is the "safe" one and the others aren't. The real differences are in how each one handles a drop, how it seals, how much it weighs in a bag, and what it actually costs.
The Three Materials, Compared
| Material | Price range | Leakproof style | Handles a drop | Weight | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic (modular) | $24.99 | Whole lid seals as one, not per compartment | Durable day to day, not built to survive a hard drop the way silicone is | Lightest of the three | Reconfigurable needs, a lunch that changes shape depending on the day |
| Stainless steel | $47.99 | Whole lid seals as one, via a food-grade silicone gasket | Dents are possible under real force, but it's the most durable material long-term | Middle weight | Bigger appetites and a lunch box built to last years, not terms |
| Silicone | $24.99–$34.99 | Every compartment seals individually | Drop proof, break proof, crack proof | Heaviest of the three | Kids whose foods can't touch, or families wanting a completely plastic-free option |
Silicone: Drop Proof, Break Proof, Crack Proof, and Completely Plastic Free
This is the one real durability claim we're confident making without hedging. The silicone range is drop proof, break proof and crack proof, which matters more than it sounds once you picture a school bag getting thrown onto a bus seat or kicked across the playground. Every compartment seals on its own too, so even a full flip in a backpack doesn't mean one food touching another. It's also the only one of the three that's completely plastic free, base, lid and seal. If getting away from plastic altogether is the actual goal, silicone is the one that does that, not stainless steel.
Stainless Steel: Built for the Long Haul, Not Plastic Free
The Core stainless steel lunch box is food-grade 304 (18/8) stainless steel for the base, with a clear Tritan lid, a BPA-free copolyester rather than a standard plastic, sealed by a food-grade silicone gasket. Worth being upfront about: Tritan is still a plastic material, so the Core isn't a fully plastic-free option, the base is steel but the lid isn't. What it does offer is real capacity, 1200ml, more than the other two, with a removable T-divider that switches it between three compartments and one large space. It's the most durable material long-term and sits in the middle of the three for weight. We've got a full guide to who the Core suits best, it's a particular favourite with tweens and teens.
Plastic: Reconfigurable, Lightest, and the Most Affordable
The modular Quad and Roundie are plastic, with clip closures that let them change shape, Quad reconfigures down from 4 compartments to 1, Roundie folds from a 6-pocket bento into a single bowl. That flexibility is the trade-off for a lid that only seals as a whole, not per section. It's the lightest of the three materials and, at $24.99, the most accessible entry point into the range.
So, Are Stainless Steel Lunch Boxes Actually Better?
For capacity and long-term durability, yes, stainless steel wins, though it's worth knowing the lid is Tritan, a BPA-free plastic, not the fully plastic-free option some people assume it is. For a kid who needs their food to genuinely never touch, a bag that might get dropped hard, or a completely plastic-free box, silicone is the better call. For a lunch that needs to change shape day to day without spending much, and the lightest option in the bag, plastic does that job. "Better" depends on which problem you're actually solving, not which material sounds more premium.
Shop by Material
Shop Silicone Lunch Boxes · Shop the Stainless Steel Core · Shop the Full Bento Range · Shop All Kids Lunch Boxes
FAQs
Are stainless steel lunch boxes better than plastic or silicone?
For capacity and long-term durability, yes. For drop resistance, compartments that seal individually, and going fully plastic free, silicone is the stronger choice. For budget, the lightest weight and reconfigurable compartments, plastic wins. It depends on which problem matters most to you.
Is silicone or stainless steel safer for kids' food?
Both are food safe, along with the plastic range. None of the three materials is the "safe" option over the others, they're all built to food-grade standards.
Which lunch box material is the most durable?
Stainless steel lasts the longest overall. Silicone is the one built to survive an actual drop without cracking or breaking, which is a different kind of durability.
Is the stainless steel lunch box completely plastic free?
No. The base is stainless steel, but the lid is Tritan, a BPA-free copolyester, sealed with a food-grade silicone gasket. The silicone range is the genuinely plastic-free option.
Which is the lightest lunch box material?
Plastic is the lightest, stainless steel sits in the middle, and silicone is the heaviest of the three.
Related reads: bento buying guide, Core stainless steel bento guide, best kids lunch box for school Australia.